Should very rich people stop existing?

Some people that have problems with money might think that very rich people should stop existing, that the state should take more money from them and give to the rest of us.
But would be that normal?
That rich people or there parents worked for that money.
I talk only about people that did not made money from illegal activities.
Only because they are smart and learned and had opportunities that they used, why should they be punished for that?
Because after all, getting money from them can be interpreted as a punishment.
We, the rest, using politicians can make them to invest the money well, with proper laws and by this way creating opportunities for us to making money and having chances to becoming richer.
In a very advanced society of the future, that will come, I think that people will not have to work so they can have what to eat, a house and clothes, we will work because we will want access to more than that.
Imagine a society where top technology is given to all people, because there are enough resources, if too many smart people will stop working, advances in technology will stop, because we need more brain power to have discoveries faster.
People that have the money and are smart are motivated to build new thing that can be used by the rest of us.
Don’t envy the rich, become one and motivate the others to become like you!
I admire all the great people who made companies that made products that changed our lives and will continue to change it from now on, in better I hope.
If the government system would change and the state will take most of the money of a rich person and a millionaire will remain with 100.000$ for example and would be fired because the state think that someone else would be better for that CEO position, what do you think that person will do?
Do you think will build a new great company?
I don’t think so.
Why to use his brain again and create a great company again and to see how the state can take it anytime, because tries to apply meritocracy and a IQ test and other evaluation tells the state that someone else is better for that position?
You can’t do such things, because they are unfair.
Yes, you can punish the company and the creator of it with the company, if he made bad decisions that produced bad effects (create unhealthy products that does not respect state laws), but you can’t destroy a person because is smart and people gave that person money for this, because made great products.
I’m not rich, I don’t have even 5.000$, but if I will ever be, I don’t want the state to punish me because there are many people that don’t have jobs.
What would be my fault for those people?
It would be my fault if I could hire all of them and remain in good standing as company, remember that every company has competition, if costs skyrocket then the prices will skyrocket too and will be a problem remaining in business.